Skip to content

Pattern Proposal: Rule-Grounded Compliance Evaluation

Summary

Evaluates code and architectural delta compliance by evaluating diffs against codified rule contexts and generating structured finding metrics.

Candidate Pattern

  • ID: rule-grounded-compliance-evaluation
  • Classification: intelligence
  • Maturity: strategic_direction
  • Type: emerging

Observed Signals

No specific signals listed.

Evidence

Supporting Evidence

Scope Assessment

  • Evidence Strength: high
  • Confidence: high
  • Applies to: ideas-to-life-cas

Rationale

  • Intent: Continuously verify whether repository changes conform to organizational architectural standards before PR merge.
  • Context: Within CI workflows (e.g. cas-build-validation.yml), PRs must be audited against cas-knowledge architectural rules.
  • Force: Human architectural reviews are infrequent and slow down deployment velocity.
  • Force: Purely static linting tools cannot evaluate architectural intent or semantic compliance.

Traceability

Artifact source: proposed-patterns