Skip to content

Alignment Summary

overall_status: critical critical_issues: 1 high_issues: 1 medium_issues: 3 low_issues: 0

Alignment Findings

  • [MEDIUM] 22 proposed items without progression.
  • Recommendation:
  • [CRITICAL] Governance velocity breach: Proposed architecture items are significantly outpacing the architect's decision-making bandwidth.
  • Recommendation: Initiate an emergency backlog grooming session to reconcile proposed work items and convert high-priority proposals into ADRs.
  • [HIGH] Persistence Lag: Implementation state (DONE) is decoupled from formal architectural approval.
  • Recommendation: Draft and approve ADRs for all items currently in a DONE stage to ensure the architectural audit trail is complete.
  • [MEDIUM] Project Rule Void: There are no local project-specific governance rules defined to tailor the alignment engine's behavior.
  • Recommendation: Formalize 'emergent heuristics' from the AID (e.g., governance_velocity_limit) into the rule_context as project-specific rules.
  • [MEDIUM] Traceability Disconnect: Completed Architecture Work (AW) items are not reflected in the AEM Evolution Map.
  • Recommendation: Synchronize the AEM Evolution Map with the Architecture Work Registry to ensure the dashboard reflects completed capability improvements.

Architecture Work Derived

  • [MEDIUM] Too many unprogressed proposals
  • [HIGH] Reconcile the 22 proposed items in the AEM backlog; reject obsolete items and group related ones into unified decision threads.
  • [HIGH] Retroactively document and approve the architectural decisions for 'Hybrid LLM Gateway' and other implementation-complete capabilities.
  • [MEDIUM] Define and implement project-specific rules in rule_context to manage local governance thresholds and precedence.