Skip to content

Alignment Summary

overall_status: critical critical_issues: 1 high_issues: 2 medium_issues: 2 low_issues: 0

Alignment Findings

  • [MEDIUM] 22 proposed items without progression.
  • Recommendation:
  • [CRITICAL] Governance Velocity Breach: Proposed architectural items are outpacing decision-making bandwidth.
  • Recommendation: Initiate a batch reconciliation of the 22 proposed work items to either accept, reject, or defer.
  • [HIGH] Persistence Lag: 'CAS Workflow Execution Model and Runtime Onboarding' is marked DONE in AEM but is not present in the Key Architectural Decisions (ADR) list.
  • Recommendation: Retroactively create and accept ADRs for the CAS Workflow Execution Model to align documentation with implementation reality.
  • [HIGH] Intent Traceability Void: Missing structured link between business requirements and resulting architectural decisions.
  • Recommendation: Formalize the Business Intent Schema and begin mapping existing ADRs to specific business intent drivers.
  • [MEDIUM] Project Rule Gap: Absence of project-specific governance rules to override or tailor global heuristics.
  • Recommendation: Define at least three project-specific rules that address local constraints (e.g., velocity limits or specific technology boundaries).

Architecture Work Derived

  • [MEDIUM] Too many unprogressed proposals
  • [HIGH] Batch processing and reconciliation of the 22 proposed items in the Governance Registry.
  • [HIGH] Formal ADR generation for 'CAS Workflow Execution Model' and 'Runtime Onboarding'.
  • [MEDIUM] Establishment of the Project Rule Layer for ideas-to-life-cas.